Crypto Payment Gateways for iGaming
Compare crypto payment providers by legal entity, gambling acceptance, custody, conversion, settlement, data roles and integration.
6 providers compared · Content updated · Provider eligibility reviewed . Commercial relationships do not affect editorial conclusions.
A crypto payment gateway can generate deposit addresses, detect transfers, screen wallets, convert assets, and settle the merchant in crypto, stablecoins, or fiat. Those functions do not automatically include custody, exchange, acquiring, player KYC, or permission to serve gambling operators. The legal and technical roles have to be checked separately.
The comparison focuses on the contracting entity, regulatory status, custody and key control, supported networks, confirmation and reorg handling, screening, travel-rule or transfer controls where applicable, conversion, settlement, refunds, reconciliation, and access to transaction data. Coin counts and instant-settlement figures are included only when their scope and method are clear.
A player balance shown as credited is not necessarily final settlement. The operator may credit after a provider webhook while the transfer still faces confirmations, chain reorganization, screening review, conversion, bank settlement, or a custodial hold. The contract and ledger design must distinguish detected, credited, spendable, converted, settled, frozen, refunded, and withdrawn states and assign the loss when those states diverge.
Name custody, conversion, and settlement before features
Crypto payment services can generate addresses, monitor networks, hold keys, screen transfers, convert assets, and settle fiat or crypto. Those functions may be performed by different entities with separate permissions and risk.
Use when: The payment flow uses crypto addresses, networks, screening, conversion, or asset settlement.
Keep explicit: Custody, key control, performing entities, assets, conversion, and financial permissions must be explicit.
Use when: Compared with Crypto payment gateways, use this route when the buyer needs to map gateways, orchestration, processors, acquirers, merchants, and settlement together.
Keep explicit: Keep this distinction from Crypto payment gateways: technical connectivity does not prove gambling acceptance, custody, acquiring, or funds access.
Use when: Compared with Crypto payment gateways, use this route when onboarding, screening, monitoring, cases, decisions, and reports need one connected workflow.
Keep explicit: Keep this distinction from Crypto payment gateways: each input, rule, reviewer, escalation, filing duty, and record owner must remain traceable.
Use when: Compared with Crypto payment gateways, use this route when a processor, acquirer, or merchant route must underwrite and settle gambling transactions.
Keep explicit: Keep this distinction from Crypto payment gateways: contracting entity, markets, schemes, reserves, chargebacks, holds, and termination drive the risk.
What this comparison covers
- • A current operator-facing crypto-payment module that receives, detects, routes, converts, or settles digital-asset payments
- • Custodial, noncustodial, crypto-settlement, and fiat-settlement products when wallet, key, conversion, funds, and contracting roles are explicit
- • Broader payment providers only through the separately defined crypto-payment module that qualifies them here
- • A crypto casino platform, token project, consumer wallet, exchange, custodian, banking product, or blockchain analytics tool with no identified merchant-payment module
- • A fiat PSP connector or a list of coins and networks treated as a live crypto-payment route
- • Gambling acceptance, custody, conversion, screening, network support, or settlement inferred from a partner or group company
What operators should compare
These are procurement dimensions, not assumptions that every field is known. A blank or unknown detail is not treated as a negative score.
Service and entity chain
Contracting entity, payment provider, wallet operator, custodian, exchange, screening provider, fiat payment institution, bank, and settlement entity.
Wallet and key control
Address generation, omnibus or segregated wallets, private-key control, signing authority, custody, recovery, withdrawals, insolvency treatment, and merchant access.
Asset and network flow
Supported asset and chain pair, address format, confirmations, finality, reorganization handling, fees, underpayment, overpayment, wrong network, and refund route.
Screening and decision boundary
Wallet and transaction screening, data sources, thresholds, holds, manual review, transfer information, operator KYC, escalation, reporting, and final decision owner.
Authorization and gambling scope
Exact contracting entity, crypto and payment permissions, permitted custody or exchange activity, gambling acceptance, operator-license types, player and merchant markets, and subcontracted regulated roles.
Conversion and settlement
Conversion entity and event, rate source, spread, asset exposure, settlement asset and currency, account, timing definition, minimums, failed settlement, and reconciliation.
Integration, data, and exit
API and hosted flow, webhooks, idempotency, address reuse, invoice expiry, ledger identifiers, exports, controller roles, outages, wallet portability, and termination access.
Market snapshot
This snapshot summarizes the products that qualify each listing. Provider and role totals count companies; product type, ownership, availability, and delivery-model totals count the relevant products or recorded variants. One product can have several delivery models, so those counts can exceed the provider total. It does not count every product sold by a company and is not a market-share measure or ranking.
- Payments
- 6
- Service provider
- 5
- Integrator
- 1
- First party
- 4
- Mixed
- 2
- Standalone and bundled
- 3
- Standalone
- 2
- Bundle only
- 1
- API
- 6
Comparison at a glance
This table uses the qualifying product scope for this hub. Unknown means the field remains unresolved; it does not mean the provider lacks that option.
| Provider | Qualifying product | Ownership | Availability | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2BINPAY |
| First party | Standalone | API |
| BVNK |
| First party | Standalone and bundled | API |
| CoinGate |
| First party | Standalone and bundled | API |
| Nuvei |
| Mixed | Standalone and bundled | API |
| Payhound |
| First party | Standalone | API |
| Paysafe |
| Mixed | Bundle only | API |
Providers
RFP shortlist: 0 of 5
Select two to five providers to open a named proposal comparison. This is separate from the editorial pick.
B2BINPAY
B2BINPAY directly supplies crypto payment requests, merchant and enterprise wallets, custody, automatic conversion, fiat and crypto withdrawals, end-user payouts, reporting, and API access. The casino route applies that stack to player deposits and operator settlement.
Why listed here: B2BINPAY provides casino payment and end-user payout flows through an El Salvador entity licensed for exchange, transfer, and custody.
Relevant product
iGaming Crypto Payment Processing
- Type: Payments
- Ownership: First party
- Availability: Standalone
BVNK
BVNK provides business wallets, stablecoin and crypto pay-ins, fiat and crypto conversion, payouts, virtual accounts, and reconciliation through direct and embedded APIs. The gaming route converts player deposits to fiat and pays winnings back in stablecoins or other crypto.
Why listed here: BVNK supports gaming deposits, asset conversion, and player winnings through Malta entities holding crypto and payment permissions.
Relevant product
Stablecoin Payments for Gaming
- Type: Payments
- Ownership: First party
- Availability: Standalone and bundled
CoinGate
CoinGate directly provides crypto payment processing through a hosted checkout, API, plugins, and account infrastructure. An approved merchant can receive shopper crypto, keep or convert it, withdraw crypto or fiat, issue refunds, and send payouts.
Why listed here: CoinGate provides an iGaming gateway under payment and crypto permissions and accepts only gambling businesses with valid authorization.
Relevant product
iGaming Crypto Payment Gateway
- Type: Payments
- Ownership: First party
- Availability: Standalone and bundled
Nuvei
Nuvei offers crypto pay-ins, payouts, conversion, and settlement rather than only a connector to a crypto method. The gaming route supports crypto acceptance with fiat reconciliation, while the digital-asset product covers on-ramp, off-ramp, stablecoin settlement, and payment processing.
Why listed here: Nuvei offers actual crypto payment, payout, conversion, and settlement flows through Nuvei and partner transaction providers.
Relevant product
Pay With Crypto
- Type: Payments
- Ownership: Mixed
- Availability: Standalone and bundled
Payhound
Payhound directly supplies crypto payment infrastructure to approved iGaming operators. Its current product supports player crypto deposits, address mapping, crypto payouts, conversion into fiat, fiat settlement, wallets, and API-based transaction handling.
Why listed here: Payhound Limited provides an iGaming crypto product used by Gaming1 and holds Malta payment and crypto permissions.
Relevant product
iGaming Crypto Payment Processing
- Type: Payments
- Ownership: First party
- Availability: Standalone
Paysafe
IntegratorPay with Crypto is a live North American crypto deposit method for approved iGaming and daily-fantasy-sports merchants using the Paysafe Gateway. Paysafe creates the payment handle, returns gateway status, exposes webhook outcomes, and includes the transaction in Paysafe reporting.
Why listed here: Paysafe provides a named live iGaming gateway integration, status, webhooks, and reporting while clearly identifying MoonPay as the underlying crypto processor and settlement provider.
Relevant product
Pay with Crypto
- Type: Payments
- Ownership: Mixed
- Availability: Bundle only
Providers are listed alphabetically; this page is not a ranking.
A company can appear in several comparisons when the same product fits more than one buying need. Distinct products are assessed separately.
Crypto transaction exception matrix
Specify how each on-chain exception changes the processor record and player balance.
Exception
Wrong amount or asset
Handling rule
Set tolerances, expiry, conversion, manual review, refund, and customer notice.
Required trace
Address, transaction hash, quoted amount, received amount, and final disposition remain linked.
Exception
Confirmation or reorganization
Handling rule
Define credit thresholds, delayed confirmation, replaced transactions, and chain rollback behavior.
Required trace
The platform can reverse or hold value without creating an unbacked player balance.
Exception
Screening hold
Handling rule
Assign wallet screening, escalation, withdrawal approval, reporting, and release authority.
Required trace
The case record retains inputs, match reasoning, decisions, actors, and transaction state.
Exception
Settlement and refund
Handling rule
Fix conversion time, rate source, spread, payout asset, destination control, and network fees.
Required trace
Processor, treasury, platform ledger, blockchain, and player history reconcile by hash.
Procurement checks
- • Draw the funds flow for every asset, network, wallet, custodian, exchange, fiat provider, bank, settlement account, legal entity, and point where value or control changes hands.
- • Test wrong networks, unsupported tokens, underpayments, overpayments, duplicate deposits, delayed confirmations, reorganizations, fee changes, rate expiry, screening holds, refunds, and webhook replay.
- • Verify key control, recovery, wallet segregation, withdrawal authority, insolvency treatment, screening and transfer-data roles, storage, exports, and access during an outage.
- • Reconcile a deposit, conversion, gaming credit, withdrawal, refund, screening hold, and failed settlement across transaction hashes, wallet records, provider invoices, exchange trades, bank records, platform ledger entries, and player statements.
- • Rehearse provider exit with pending deposits, held transactions, merchant balances, refunds, wallet and address records, screening evidence, reconciliation data, and settlement continuity.
- • Obtain a dated entity-and-market opinion that maps each custody, exchange, transfer, payment, fiat, and gambling role to a current permission or documented exemption for the proposed route.
Limits of this comparison
- • Included providers have a current crypto-payment module and a defined delivery role. Inclusion does not imply gambling acceptance, legal availability, custody protection, complete asset or network coverage, screening effectiveness, conversion price, settlement timing, fiat access, refund support, or portability for the proposed operator.
Load this category's comparison fields, contract controls, and acceptance tests into a working decision record. You can also shortlist two to five providers above and carry their names into a side-by-side proposal evaluation.
Build the Crypto Payment Gateways for iGaming RFP